“The World Is Blue” Reflection Essay

Kylee Luckett BIO 106 Dr. Harper 4/10/2012 The humans is Blue Sylvia Earle Re ruling and synopsis by Kylee Luckett It is our choices that show what we truly atomic number 18, removed much than our abilities. -Albus Dumbledore They conjecture only a few exit forever articulate loud enough to be comprehend over the other s n sensationtheless ace thousand thousand voices on the artificial satellite. Today well-nighone is shouting. emit off of the pages of The World is Blue is Sylvia Earle, depicted object Geographic Societys explorer in Residence, and vast contri hardlyor to the sweat to preserve the planets oceans.Earles adjudge is non an inconvenient truth, fuel by politics and funding, but rather, by Earles heart for the ocean, and its unique residents. Earle explores contravention and resolution, one chapter and income tax return at a magazine. Taking Marine Wildlife The elephant in the style Earle utilizes her chapter on angle to c all(prenominal) the de mesne out on the elephant in the room-over search. Earle discusses how at one time in history, hunt believed that there was an infinite amount of fish to be caught, that there would never be a day when we would set something as popular as tuna, go extinct.We are sitting on the eve of that day. Earle genuinely brings out the reality of overfishing, almost teasing our early ideas of sustainable deed over. .. but those pesky animals didnt obey the rules.. So whats wrong with the concept of sustainable yield? (Earle) Earle pick outs keen note that you smokenot possibly farm a concept of sustainability, when you k right off side by side(p) to cipher virtually the species you are supposedly yielding. Earle debunks the idea of a surfeit in the ocean of a goodish ecosystem, stating What APPEARS to be an overabundance to human observers is a natural insurance policy (Earle) Earle applies the want idea of questionable yield to shipboard soldier mammals. She spends a fair am ount of this chapter on the touchy subdue that is almost eternally controversial-whaling. She lends a nod to her own initial ignorance of ocean mammals in an honest confession. I had come to regard the cats, dogs, horses, squirrels and rabbits I knew personalisedly as individuals, but I did not think of whales the same way. (Earle) She goes on there after, to explain her emotional experience of collision a whale, and her forever diverged perspective.Whaling is just the pitch of the iceberg or in this case, dissolve glacier, for Earle. Earle shifts into the amount of marine mammals killed as by catch, and the epidemic that breeds within the fishing industry. What would the public think if in item the by catch of their tuna salad was the firm Flipper? Would they still quality galosh about their shouted dolphin safe tuna? I recall my six year old self, carefully checking each notify of tuna my mother placed in our shopping cart, seeking out that shrimpy smiling dolph in to confirm that my eat would be free of dolphin massacre.So untold has changed since those would be conservation suits. Earle does not leave to mention the smaller, less thought of creatures-the shellfish. Earle opens her chapter with a history lesson centered on oysters, at one time in our history- she notes . they were exposit as hazards to navigation. (Earle) Today, few would ever say abundant in the same judgment of conviction as oysters. Earle pay homage to the immensity of the shellfish in our ocean, discussing eachthing from clams to my personal favorite-the octopus, whom Earle notes as a critical touch off of the oceans health.Earle closes her shellfish division with a sentence that hits close to home. I harbor decided to cease and desist, hoping that each lobster I dont eat, allow for increase the chances that somewhere a lobster susceptibility live, and do what lobsters do as a part of a healthy ocean. (Earle) With that statement, I immediately connected on a personal level to Earle. As a devout vegetarian, I too, have hopes that every animal I do not eat, pass on aid in the future of that species, and ultimately, our planets future. She lends advice however, to these dynamic and mingled issues- and it is all so simple.Do not meet, what you tin cannot replace, and do not take what you realise nothing about. The world is a vampire- sent to drain. Earles second major concept of her book is the relentless greed of the human race. through and through pollution, ignorance, and pillaging of all resources, the human race has become that of a vampire species, eating off of the seductive lure of power, money, and claim that our planets oceans bring. A concomitant lipstick wearing, wolf hunting politico do a statement that is turn unanimous with most of America today- employment baby, drill. For the unknowing, that is Sarah Palin, a woman who agrees with offshore, and in some cases, onshore bore. The topic of embrocate is sensit ive. Do you drill in former wildlife and marine reserves to avoid wars with your supplying companies? about of America, even the left minded Barak Obama was pendulous to the idea of on and offshore boring in the United States backyard. The steadily rising price of fuel and oil are making more Americans nod yes, than ever before. Earle is shaking her head no. generally beca office the action occurs underwater, out of the public view, footling attention has focused on what in truth happens on the ocean floor where drilling takes place, or what creatures are displaced by the thousands of miles of line of descent laced across the bottom (Earle)Despite my flagitious vendetta against Sarah Palin, I myself, had not in truth considered the impact of pipelines on the ocean floor, I was always more focused on oil spills and the tragedies which take place thereafter. Earle does make serious mention of oil spills, relive the Exxon Valdez casualty that permanently damaged the Alaskan sho reline.The book even features the text of Earles testimony before Congress on the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. It is not the spills, the pipelines, or the seeping of the oil that sets a tic for Earle its the use of the oil itself. The subject everyone has heard about, even if they didnt want to. It doesnt take Al Gore to make one think or hear about climate change. The 1950s were a time for poodle skirts, milkshakes, and good old way of life family values, along with cigarettes, seat beltless cars, and DDT. My station is it should not stun anyone that emissions are impacting the planet in a negative way.Earle seems to feel the same. Civilization currently thrives on oil based economies, and is continuing to do so despite herculean efforts to move forward from fuels that pollute the planet today and will potentially shorten the number of tomorrows our species will have. (Earle) Sylvia Earle is not an extreme leftist she is an improve woman who has earned beside oil engineer leaders, judicature officials, and offshore experts. I believe it is these security that make her so magnetic, and tune endorsers thoughts to her direction. Her bolide chapter on oil has n Achilles heel, her lose of insight on solution. It is not as though she has an answer and it is not as if she is not willing to share, it is that no one has a surefire way to reroute the flight of emissions. This chapter, though mind-blowingly effective, still has an unfinished climax, much like our planet. Uneducated or Unwilling to meditate? Earle is consistently using the same chronicle throughout her book as to wherefore individuals are not taking more action. In every chapter, she highlights prototypes of attitudes and expressions from people associated to the topic.Earles book is one of the tools our society now has to combat the epidemic of the uneducated on the subject of anthropogenic damage to nature. there is not a single environmentalist who at one time did not face t he reality transition of a need for change. The issue is entirely multiform and tedious because alongside the uneducated, are the unwilling. thither has been an outward cry on the subject of climate change from Christians, denouncing it as political corruption, or that climate change is only an effect listed in the book of Revelations.Earle does not seem to let the major issue of uneducated and unwilling affect her view on the future. She positively lists the strides being made to better understand the ocean. In Earles closing chapters, it is as if she is taking the reader by the hand, and showing how we can all make a difference. I comprise Earles book to be stirring. I have definitely become something of a cheerleader for Earle after reading this book. As a woman pursuing conservation skill as a career, I demonstrate Earle to be a keen example of what one person can do in their field that can change the thoughts of others worldwide.Earle took her opportunity as an author, a nd produced an extraordinary enrolment that covers every issue associated with the ocean and humans, but goes a step beyond outlining whats wrong. Earle uniquely includes what is right, and what is currently being make to change the course of the future. I have read several books on environmental issues, and none have so effectively utilized the opportunity to educate and inspire individuals like Earle has done in her book. Earle has cause me to keep fighting the good fight. I often struggle over if my work with polar bears ill ever be worth anything, and Earles book was the push button I needed to continue on. plane if I do not know the outcome, at least I can say, I have made the effort in my lifetime to try. Earle sets a measuring rod for each reader, to simply make choices in favor of the planet, and its oceans. We may not all have the ability to write books, spread speeches, or work directly alongside the ocean, but we all have choices we can make to better our tomorro w. We are lifetime in a time of big uncertainty, and are all faced with a forked road ahead of us.One leads us to certain extinction, the other to opportunity to at least try to change for the better. The world is blue today, but what will it carriage like tomorrow? What will our children see when they look to the sea? The answer lies entirely on our willingness to change. Will we be the multiplication who turned the course of the planet slightly? Or will we be the propagation who had the opportunity and denied our own species, and so umpteen others a future? Works Cited Earle, Sylvia A. The World is Blue. Washington DC National Geographic, 2009.